Sample Extended Essay Titles

Sample Extended Essay TitlesSample Extended Essay Titles can be quite difficult to create for students. They need to make sure they have a great example in order to follow along. They don't need to make a textbook like example, they just need something they can relate back to in terms of the subject. You want to make sure they're going to come back to the idea or material they're studying in the future.First thing is first, find a sample that they can relate to. A good one is a college paper. This is the perfect example, because it's something you can share with them at some point. One idea you can do is for them to have to write something about their favorite team. Since they haven't taken college courses about football, this will be something they can relate to and even write about.Another thing you can do is for them to have to take a look at how these players handle pressure. When you're writing up a sample, make sure they have to identify themselves as belonging to their respect ive sports teams. Also if they're a ball player or a pitcher then be sure to list the first three letters of their full name. Make sure they understand what the letters stand for.Example two is for the football players to have to write about a particular game, and even the winning team. Now they can identify themselves as a football player, the teams they belong to, and then the last letter of their name. They can write it with pride knowing that they have a chance to play in a big game.Example three is the writer to do a simple sport article about any type of sport. Now they are familiar with all the sport they can play and they also know what the letters stand for.The next thing you can do is for them to be able to understand how an extended essay title works. This means that they have to be able to identify the article as an extended essay, something more than a standard article. So in their mind it should be about what they're doing.The best way to go about creating samples is f or them to have to spend some time on it. You don't want them to rush and create something that's not great. So they can have a little time to look at the whole example and they can make sure that they get it right.

7 Tips for Overcoming Writers Block

7 Tips for Overcoming Writers Block 7 Tips for Overcoming Writer’s Block 7 Tips for Overcoming Writer’s Block By Mark Nichol A would-be teacher was assigned to tutor a boy who was not just reluctant, not just resistant, but actually hostile to reading. The first day, the tutor took the boy aside and asked him to read the first sentence of a book. The boy did so, slowly, haltingly, but he reached the end without much difficulty. Before he had a chance to throw up his hands and go into his â€Å"I can’t read!† act, however, the tutor stopped him, thanked him, and brought him back to his classroom. The next day, the student was permitted to read only two or three sentences before his tutor stopped him. This pattern continued for only a few days before the boy asked to be able to continue reading. What is this, the chorus-of-angels moment in a mawkish TV movie? No, it’s a true story, and it’s an intriguing idea for writers as well as readers (and the first of these seven tips): If you have writer’s block, sit down and write one sentence. One sentence. Even if you want to keep going. The next time, allow yourself two sentences. The third day, stop after three sentences. Avoid the urge to leap to an impressive word count right away. Try for 100, 200, then 300 words. Only then, after about a week, should you set a more ambitious goal. 2. Establish a consistent schedule that you fail to keep only in the case of an emergency. You have commitments and responsibilities, certainly, but if you can watch TV or surf online or exercise each day, you can write each day. Do it on your lunch hour or during your commute if you have to, but do it. 3. Commit to achieving a word count, not persevering for a certain amount of time. Try for 500 words, and then ramp up to 1,000 if you feel up to it. Those counts may not seem much, but at those rates, you can write a substantial article or a short story in a week or two, a short nonfiction book in a month, a novel in a season. (Revision is another matter, and another post.) If your writing requires ongoing research, cut the actual word count in half (and do the writing first), or set aside a given number of days a week to just fact finding. 4. Don’t rewrite until you’re done. If your project is a book, give each chapter a single pass but then move on, and don’t review it again until the entire manuscript is done. 5. There’s no law that says you have to write something in the order in which it will be read. Sketch the beginning and the end, whether it’s an essay or a novel, but tackle the parts you’re itching to get to first. But don’t evade troublesome or onerous sections by repeatedly reworking completed portions. 6. Juggle more than one project. If you weary of one article or story or book, give it a rest and run with another one for a while. 7. Remember the only readership that matters: You. Your goal is not to write the greatest article or poem for how-to guide or epic novel ever created. Your goal is to satisfy yourself. Author Toni Morrison once said, â€Å"If there’s a book you really want to read but it hasn’t been written yet, then you must write it.† And you must do so because you want to read it. If anybody else does, too, that’s just icing on the cake. Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Freelance Writing category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:20 Types and Forms of HumorOne Fell Swoop5 Examples of Misplaced Modifiers

Solons Constitution and the Rise of Democracy

Solons Constitution and the Rise of Democracy And all the others were called Thetes, who were not admitted to any office, but could come to the assembly, and act as jurors; which at first seemed nothing, but afterwards was found an enormous privilege, as almost every matter of dispute came before them in this latter capacity.- Plutarch Life of Solon Reforms of Solons Constitution After dealing with the immediate crises in 6th century Athens, Solon redefined citizenship so as to create the foundations of democracy. Before Solon, the eupatridai (nobles) had a monopoly on the government by virtue of their birth. Solon replaced this hereditary aristocracy with one based on wealth. In the new system, there were four propertied classes in Attica (greater Athens). Depending on how much property they owned, citizens were entitled to run for certain offices denied those lower on the property scale. In return for holding more positions, they were expected to contribute more. Those who were worth 500 measures of fruits, dry and liquid, he placed in the first rank, calling them Pentacosiomedimni (note the prefix meaning five);Those who could keep a horse, or were worth three hundred measures, were named Hippada Teluntes, and made the second class (note the hipp- prefix meaning horse);The Zeugitae, who had two hundred measures, were in the third (note the zeug- is thought to refer to a yoke).Solon added, as a fourth class, the thetes, serfs with only a small amount of property. Classes (Review) PentacosiomedimnoiHippeisZeugitaiThetes Offices to which members could be elected (by class) PentacosiomedimnoiTreasurer,Archons,Financial officials, and theBoule.HippeisArchons,Financial officials, and theBoule.ZeugitaiFinancial officials, and theBouleThetes Property Qualification and Military Obligation Pentacosiomedimnoiproduced 500 measures or more of produce per year.Hippeis (cavalry)produced 300 measures.Zeugitai (hoplites)produced 200 measures.Thetesdidnt produce enough for the military census. It is thought that Solon was the first to admit the thetes to the ekklesia (assembly), the meeting of all citizens of Attica. The ekklesia had a say in appointing archons and could also listen to accusations against them. The citizenry also formed a judicial body (dikasteria), which heard many legal cases. Under Solon, rules were relaxed as to who could bring a case to court. Earlier, the only ones who could do so were the injured party or his family, but now, except in cases of homicide, anyone could. Solon may also have established the boule, or Council of 400, to determine what should be discussed in the ekklesia. One hundred men from each of the four tribes (but only those in the upper three classes) would have been picked by lot to form this group. However, since the word boule would also have been used by the Areopagus, and since Cleisthenes created a boule of 500, there is cause to doubt this Solonian accomplishment. The magistrates or archons may have been selected by lot and election. If so, each tribe elected 10 candidates. From the 40 candidates, nine archons were selected by lot each year. This system would have minimized influence-peddling while giving the gods the ultimate say. However, in his Politics, Aristotle says the archons were selected the way they had been before Draco, with the exception that all citizens had the right to vote. Those archons who had completed their year in office were enrolled in the Council of the Areopagus. Since archons could only come from the top three classes, its composition was entirely aristocratic. It was considered a censoring body and the guardian of the laws. The ekklesia had the power to try archons at the end of their year in office. Since the ekklesia probably selected the archons, and since, in time, it became common practice to make legal appeals to the ekklesia, the ekklesia (i.e., the people) had the supreme power. References J.B. Bury. A History of Greece.Reed Colleges David Silvermans Early Athenian Institutions (http://homer.reed.edu/GkHist/EarlyAthenianLect.html)John Porters Solon (http://duke.usask.ca/~porterj/CourseNotes/SolonNotes.html)Athenian Democracy (keele.ac.uk/depts/cl/iahcla~7.htm)Ancient Greece: Athens (wsu.edu:8080/~dee/GREECE/ATHENS.HTM)

Marketing - Purchase Decision & Consumer Behaviour Assignment

Marketing - Purchase Decision & Consumer Behaviour - Assignment Example Issues which contributed to choosing the brand and buying the product I have been using this brand for a long time, and I seem to like it. I always buy yogurt which I take when I feel like eating something during the day. Date 21 July 2013 Items 1X Non-stick frying pan Cost $204.00 Seller Kleenmaid/ Compass Capital Partners Time spent on making the decision One month Effort put into decision making process Low involvement Substitute products or competing brands This decision was not made in light of the brand of the product. I only needed a non-stick pan for doing my frying. Issues which contributed to choosing the brand and buying the product I needed a non-stick frying pan, and a friend suggested this particular brand to me. Date 21 July 2013 Items 2X Temptin Chocolate biscuits Cost $24.00 Seller Dick Smith Foods Time spent on making the decision None/ Impulse buying Effort put into decision making process Low involvement Substitute products or competing brands There are a number o f both substitute products as well as a number of competing brands. These include the Tim Tam biscuit brand among others. Issues which contributed to choosing the brand and buying the product This was an impulse buying, which was not determined by any brand or utility considerations. I do not have any considerations for candy brands and buy any brand. Date 21 July 2013 Items A bottle of Aglianico red wine Cost $395.00 Seller Brown Brothers Milawa Vineyard Time spent on making the decision

Business Communication Diary Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words - 1

Business Communication Diary - Essay Example The various key concepts may include building goodwill practical, concise, clear, factual, and persuasive concepts among the involved parties. The proper practice of the above elements brings about an effective communication between the involved individuals. Clear communication being the key to each and every effective undertaking needs to be enhanced in order to facilitate the growth and expansion of the different ideological methodologies used in different categories. Communication needs to be more persuasive in order to make the involved individuals more satisfied in their discussion. With the satisfaction of the parties involved such as the customers, there is the retention of the customers thus earning the business loyalty which is a key element in enhancing the growth of business goodwill (Bovel, Courtland, and John, 50). Transparency in any communication is another key factor in enabling effective communication to take place between parties because it fosters and endeavours finding the truthiness of the matter to avoid deceit hence creating trust between the parties involved. In analysing the prevailing operations, various discrepancies were encountered among them being the transparency from the different personnel involved. The fact that communication is at times hectic, analysing the available situations makes it easier for the solving of the available issues on the time they are encountered. The total interpretation of the issue makes it easier for the discussion to be held. The analysis of an issue helps in coming up with the most crucial factors to be considered in the discussion thus making the communication much more coherent. On the comparison of the done analysis on the different undertakings, proper analysis brings in more information to the individuals thus enhancing the under stability of the issues being talked about. Analysing any issue makes it easier to have the discussion much lively as the involved

Understanding The Legal Systems Of The World Law Essay

Understanding The Legal Systems Of The World Law Essay I truly believe that our modern society needs Law. Laws are guidelines that set out appropriate behaviour, so we are required to follow this system of rules, in order to keep everything balanced and stabilized. Without the fulfillment of these desired tasks, man simply will become equal to animals or worse still, allow their darker sides to emerge and control their lives. Legal Systems of the World For this purpose every country has a certain system that the all citizens are required to obey: up to date there are about two hundred countries in the world and each of them makes its own Legal System that is based on certain characteristics and factors of the country. The Legal System consists of certain laws and rules that shape the citizens morality and behaviour in the society. There are many academic terms describing what legal system is but from my point of view the best one is the description by J.H Merryman: The three most widespread Legal Systems are: Continental Law Legal System, Common Law Legal System and Religious Law Legal System. Each of these legal systems is unique and has its own specific features and individual structure. Lets take a brief look on each system and see how systems differ from each other or discover their similarities. Common Law Legal System History, sources and structure The common law system prevails in Britain and its former colonies, including Australia, Canada, and the United States. Traditionally, the common law system, as the name implies, was governed not by a code, but by court-made law that developed incrementally over time. It is different from the civil-law system, which is introduced mostly in Europe and in areas colonized by France and Spain. The body of decisional law based largely on custom as declared by English judges after the Norman Conquest of 1066. The common law doctrine of following precedent, known as stare decisis remains an important component of both the English and American legal systems today. English common law was based primarily on custom, tradition, and precedent rather than a formal written legal code. Over centuries of experience, the common law became the major influence on the development of American criminal law both before and after the American Revolution. After the Revolution, the common law continued to be the basic law of most states. However, today almost all common law principles and rules have been enacted by legislative bodies into statutes with modern variations. ). One of the interesting characteristics of the system is that the common-law system allows judges to look to other jurisdictions or to draw upon past or present judicial experience for analogies to help in making a decision. T his flexibility allows common law to deal with changes that lead to unanticipated controversies. Civil Law Legal System History, sources and structure and developed in Continental Europe and around the world. It is divided into two branches: the codified Roman law and uncodified Roman law. The Differences and Similarities between the Legal Systems Common law and civil law legal systems share similar social objectives: individualism, liberalism and personal rights. A major difference between the civil law and common law is that priority in civil law is given to doctrine over jurisprudence, while the opposite is true in the common law: it finds in judge-made precedent the base of its law. The civil law doctrines function is to draw from cases the rules and the principles which will clarify and purge the subject of impure elements, and thus provide both the practice and the courts with a guide for the solution of particular cases in the future. The common law author focuses on fact patterns. He or she analyzes cases presenting similar but not identical facts, extracting from the specific rules, and then, through deduction, determines the often very narrow scope of each rule, and sometimes proposes new rules to cover facts that have not yet presented themselves. Common law jurisprudence sets out a new specific rule to a new specific set of facts and provides the principal source of law, while civil law jurisprudence applies general principles, and that jurisprudence is only a secondary source of law of explanation. Civil law judgments are written in a more formalistic style than common law judgments. Civil law decisions are indeed shorter than common law decisions, and are separated into two parts the reasons and the order. This is because civil law judges are especially trained in special schools created for the purpose, while common law judges are appointed from amongst practicing lawyers, without special training. The method of writing judgments is also different. Common law judgments extensively expose the facts, compare or distinguish them from the facts of previous cases, and decide the specific legal rule relevant to the present facts. Criminal Law and Civil Law Basic Information There are two branches of law: Criminal Law and Civil Law. That means that when a person breaks any law, he or she may be judged according to what branch of law it is. Criminal Law those laws for redressing public wrongs that injure society in general and Civil Law those laws for redressing private wrongs to individuals.  Civil law attempts to right a wrong, settle a dispute, or honor an agreement. The victim is being compensated by the person who is at fault, this becomes a legal alternative to, or civilized form of, revenge. Criminal law consists of two main branches substantive criminal law and procedural criminal law. Substantive criminal law prohibits certain forms of conduct by defining what acts constitute crimes and establishing the parameters of penalties. Procedural criminal law regulates the enforcement of the substantive criminal law, the determination of guilt, and the punishment of those found guilty of crimes. Criminal Procedure and Civil Procedure Criminal Procedure. The branch of the criminal law that deals with the processes by which crimes are investigated, prosecuted, and punished. Thus, procedural criminal law is the process followed by police and the courts in the apprehension and punishment of criminals from the filing of a complaint by a member of the public or the arrest of a suspect by the police, up to the time the defendant is sent to jail, or, if convicted, to prison. Civil litigation that deals with private disputes between parties is subject to the rules of civil litigation, sometimes referred to as civil procedure. Criminal cases, deals with acts that are offenses against society as a whole, such as murder and robbery, as subject to the rules for criminal law, and is also known as the rules of criminal procedure.

Political Legitimacy Essay

In specifying political legitimacy. theoreticians Thomas Hobbes. John Locke. and Emma Goldman each put forth a distinguishable set of values that frame their position on a government’s right to govern. Hobbes. a strong advocate to the right of self-preservation. claims that the protection of life is the lone standard required for a authorities to be legitimate. On the other manus. John Locke believes that authoritiess should non merely continue life. but besides let for single autonomies and protection of private belongings. while Emma Goldman maintains the belief that authoritiess use coercion to take away freedoms and hence should ne'er. under any fortunes. be considered legitimate. Locke’s statement on political legitimacy. that more than merely one value is needed to do a legitimate authorities. is obliging because his standard protects more than merely the life of citizens. it allows for individual’s to hold their ain autonomies free from an oppressive crowned head and prevents the dangers posed by absolute freedom. This paper will put up the lines of authorities for each theoretician and explicate why Locke’s position on a representative authorities with separation of powers is more compelling than Goldman’s absence of authorities and Hobbes’ belief in a autonomous regulation. Throughout his work entitled Leviathan. Thomas Hobbes argues that the right to self-preservation takes precedency above single autonomies. In the province of nature. adult male is given the right to make whatever he deems necessary to continue his ain life. Man can therefore commit hurt to another adult male or his belongings if he thinks it is best to keep his ain life. This province of nature. being of course quarrelsome. leads to mistrust and competition. and encourages unsafe Acts of the Apostless and widespread fright. There are no bounds on the hurts or retribution that can happen within this province and as a consequence. citizens find themselves in demand of protection from the force of others. The Hobbesian compact therefore creates authorities. by puting all power in the custodies of a crowned head. to squelch their frights and supply for their protection. therefore set uping a province of peace. In set uping a compact and a authorities. Hobbes provides the natural jurisprudence that â€Å"a adult male be willing. when others are so excessively. as far-forth. as for peace. and defense mechanism of himself he shall believe it necessary. to put down this right to all things. † ( Hobbes 80 ) . This means that in order to protect himself. and happening others that desire their ain protection above other things. adult male will give up all of his rights to a autonomous regulation. Hobbes argues that failure to release all rights to one swayer will put the compact back into a province of nature. The crowned head. holding been given all rights of the compact has absolute power and can order all Torahs and grant or keep back all freedoms. He is non to stay by any Torahs himself. if so he becomes capable to the commonwealth that he regulations. hence give uping his absolute power. The compact nevertheless. is non obligated to obey the crowned head in the event that his regulation threatens their right to self- saving. This right being primary in Hobbes’ position is the lone thing which persons ought to put above all other duties. whether those responsibilities are to their crowned head or fellow adult male. If it happens that the crowned head is in any manner interfering with the right to self-preservation. a value held above all duties and autonomies of the commonwealth. members of the compact may withstand his bids and thrust themselves back into a province of war. This nevertheless. does non fade out the commonwealth ; it merely removes an person from the commonwealth. By fade outing authorities and the common wealth. the sovereign’s remotion from power topographic points the compact into that same province of nature from which they came and they so must set up a new commonwealth and autonomous power. Therefore. the lone manner a autonomous power can be removed is upon decease. though this frequently consequences in the sequence of another crowned head. either by the predecessor’s pick or by election. Whereas Thomas Hobbes believes that an absolute autonomous authorities is the lone signifier of legitimacy. Emma Goldman differs by claiming that no authorities is legitimate because they take off freedoms. Goldman puts forth the theory that persons. given absolute freedom. have the ability to regulate themselves and coexist peacefully in societal harmoniousness supplied by the solidarity of involvements. The menace of force and fear root from the coercive actions used by any and all opinion authoritiess. It is the belief that authoritiess prevent us from making what we want and force us to make things we don’t want to. Goldman says. that allow authoritiess to â€Å"rest on force. and are hence incorrect and harmful. † ( Goldman 17 ) . These authoritiess harm persons by â€Å"stealing in the signifier of revenue enhancements. [ and ] violent death in the signifier of war and capital penalty. † ( Goldman 20 ) . Since anarchism claims that force by authorities injuries citizens. authoritiess can non supply protection for citizens. Because of her insisting that authoritiess. being coercive and harmful. are ne'er legitimate. Goldman fails to even see the beginnings of authorities and the bounds of their powers such as Hobbes and Locke have. She asserts that coercive authoritiess use the menace of force and force against citizens to command them. taking authoritiess to prosecute â€Å"the absolute subordination of the person. † therefore restricting all freedoms and autonomies that in a free province. the person would hold entree to. ( Goldman 19 ) . The subordination of the people by authorities. degrading the population to mundane obeisance. creates an environment that is colourless and spiritless. Alternatively of adhering to the control of corrupt establishments. Goldman urges persons to interrupt the coercive clasp of authoritiess. withstand all authorization and prosecute the freedoms they would get within a province societal harmoniousness exempt from important regulation. Locke. keeping the belief that Hobbes’ rights of the crowned head would take to tyranny. and that Goldman’s value of absolute freedom would bring forth a weak and helter-skelter society without Torahs. makes a instance for authorities that combines the best of Goldman and Hobbesian theories. Locke’s position on political legitimacy allows for a authorities with separate powers. so as non to go oppressive. and for autonomies provided to citizens under authorities regulation to promote freedom and equality. Under Locke’s province of nature. all adult male is made equal by the edict of God. Each adult male must continue himself. but besides under God’s power. has a responsibility to keep peace amongst the whole of world. This position of equality. over Hobbes’ factor of self-doubt. as a chief quality in the province of nature therefore leads to a more spread and equal authorities. as opposed to Hobbes’ authorities in which all power is placed in one swayer. In a Lockian authorities. power is divided into the legislative and the executive. this separation of power supports one individual from holding complete control over another. and the legislative and executive. harmonizing to Locke â€Å"have regulations besides of naming and conveying the right to those who are to hold any portion in the public authorization. † ( Locke 101 ) . This means that all legislative and executive organic structures of regulating are bound by the ain Torahs which they make. so as non to go corrupt. oppressive and bastard. Locke. in holding with Hobbes. realizes that authoritiess should be established for the protection of the people ; nevertheless he besides notes that protecting an individual’s life should non be their lone map. The primary values Locke gives of life. autonomy and belongings. claim that authoritiess have a responsibility to non merely protect the life of an person. but protect their belongings and supply them with autonomies every bit good. He agrees with Goldman that the freedom of the person is an of import value non to be overlooked. and maintains the proviso that legitimate authoritiess must supply and protect citizen’s rights. Nevertheless. Locke does non travel so far as to vouch the absolute freedom that Goldman nowadayss. He predicts that complete freedoms will take society on a unsafe way and that Torahs are put in topographic point to patrol opportunisms and prevent adult male from doing injury to one another. Locke besides refutes the Hobbesian impression that merely the crowned head has the power to order which liberties to supply and which to keep back. He asserts that persons must be given cardinal rights which no authorization has the power take away. Sing belongings rights. Locke produces the â€Å"Labor Theory of Value† in which common belongings. when assorted with labour. becomes the private belongings of those who labored on it. Governments can non apportion this belongings otherwise and it must be entrusted to its rightful proprietor. On the disintegration of authorities. Locke advances the right of the public to set up new establishments of authorities if the former has become corrupt and oppressive. Locke approaches the disintegration of authoritiess by reasoning that persons have the right to arise against authoritiess that are found to be illicit. He claims that authoritiess are illicit when they â€Å"are altered without the consent and contrary to the common involvement of the people. † ( Locke 109 ) . He asserts that in this event. persons are obligated to arise and make a new regulating organic structure that responds to their wants. therefore giving rights of directing the authorities to its Godheads and keeping that the commonwealth is guaranteed some sum of power over its authorities. Locke’s construct of political legitimacy is obliging because it allows for cooperation between the populace and authorities which prevents the possibility of dictatorship that is derived from Hobbes’ theory. His theory of legitimacy besides protects life. belongings and the autonomies of people while forestalling any dangers to the populace that can be drawn from Goldman’s theory that no authorities is better than some authorities. At length. Locke’s theory. which successfully combines the values of separate important powers. authorities protections. and single autonomies. establishes a society in which there is a just and equal relationship between the commonwealth and its opinion establishment.